14
$\begingroup$

Looking at the 787's throttle quadrant, I noticed that the STAB control switch uses a typical red flip-up toggle switch guard safety cover while for the FUEL CONTROL there is a pull leverlock switch. What is the reason behind using one vs the other? is one "better" than the other?

787 throttle quadrant
(source)

$\endgroup$
1
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ REMINDER: Do not make comments that speculate or ask for speculation about recent accidents. Any such comments will be deleted; repeated violations of the rules can subject accounts to suspension. If you think that your comment is cleverly just barely not quite over the line, it probably in fact is over the line. THANK YOU for your understanding. $\endgroup$
    – Ralph J
    Commented Jul 14 at 23:18

4 Answers 4

24
$\begingroup$

Not that one is better than the other, but rather that they are different.

Muscle memory leads to being able to actuate one or the other without looking, and not getting the wrong one.

This is standard UI, and goes all the way down to the controls in your car. Different things and actions have different touch points.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 24
    $\begingroup$ I think the choice of cover-vs-pull might be informed by the fact (which I believe to be the case) that using the stabilizer cutoff would be unusual, while the fuel cutoff is used at the beginning and end of every flight. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 14 at 1:56
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ @MichaelLorton great point. The shuttle APU run switches were lever-locked, but the main engine shutdown switches were guarded. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 14 at 3:02
21
$\begingroup$

Fuel control switches have integrated red lights (crosses) to warn about fuel/engine fire. The light indicates which engine is concerned and should be switched off.

From familiarization manual:

B787 fuel control switches

  • Lights must be visible and cannot be covered contrary to stab switches.

  • We want to see the switch position and prevent it to be reset to RUN by accidentally closing the cover.

  • The switches are locked in a "down" position and must be pulled out before being actuated. When pulled out the switch also unlocks the fire handle that can be used to discharge the extinguisher in the engine.

Of course this can be designed differently, but this is the way which was selected. Having to pull the switch allows also to use this procedure to shutdown an engine in flight (e.g. after an engine fire):

  • The first pilot puts their finger on the switch corresponding to the engine to shutdown and asks the second pilot to confirm the engine can be shutdown.

  • The second pilots validates the correct switch is being used and the engine can be shutdown.

  • The first pilot sets the switch to CUTOFF.

The is to reduce the risk of shutting down the wrong engine, after some mistakes in the past.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ Clear plastic plexiglass cover and a safety catch? That would add another layer to prevention of accidental shutdown. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 14 at 10:44
  • $\begingroup$ great point DiGiovanni, though as mins says it seems it has been never been used, maybe because some user interface issues or something, but again, both grat points, thanks both $\endgroup$
    – gbe
    Commented Jul 14 at 10:55
  • $\begingroup$ @RobertDiGiovanni "Because of a poorly maintained plexiglass cover, the pilots were delayed in shutting down the on-fire engine, which potentially contributed to the fire's expansion beyond what was expected in that scenario." But still a good point you're making. I'd love to know what UI considerations were in play when the fuel shutoff switches were designed. Especially, why is a control that is used so seldom right next to one that is used so often. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 14 at 14:12
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @WayneConrad Which other control are you referring to? The procedure for shutting down an engine presumably also involves pulling the throttle right back, so having the cut-off switches in close proximity helps to associate left-throttle with left-cutoff, etc. $\endgroup$
    – MikeB
    Commented Jul 14 at 16:32
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @MikeB And in fact, all three controls for an engine fire or severe failure are in a line under the Boeing philosophy: thrust lever, master switch, fire handle. Airbus has the fire handles (push buttons) on the ceiling, a holdover from the Concorde and A300 which had a flight engineer. $\endgroup$
    – user71659
    Commented Jul 14 at 17:18
12
$\begingroup$

The run/cutoff switches are meant to stay in either position for extended periods. Cutoff = parked, run = flight

The stabilizer trim switches are meant to be temporary. Open red cover, move toggle down. When the cover is closed the toggle is automatically pushed back to “norm”.

$\endgroup$
8
$\begingroup$

There is an ergonomic principle which says that controls in a complex system should be differentiated by color, shape and placement, to prevent mistakes. Earlier cockpit designs often had controls which guaranteed mistakes, for instance the B-17 had the flap switch next to the gear switch, and they were identical switches without any differentiation at all. This caused tired pilots in sometimes shot-up airplanes to flip the wrong switch and raise the gear when the were on the ground.

This is a picture of the B-17 controls: enter image description here

You can see a number of ergonomic errors on this. The gear and flaps are the two red boxes in the picture, identical switches and practically next to each other. the other switches for lights, fuel cut-off valves, boost pumps and lights were all together and identical switches. It was easy to accidentally shut off the fuel rather than turn on the boost pump by mistake, and it did happen.

This is the throttle quadrant and gear switch of a PA-28: enter image description here

You can see the mixture and throttle are different colors, shapes and placements. The gear is close at hand, but also a very different shape and color. The Boeing cockpits don't use toggle switches partly to make them easily identifiable visually and by feel.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.